Thursday, February 23, 2012

Two of the Best Movie Soundtracks

There have only been 2 movies where the soundtracks really struck me. Those movies would be “Dear John” and “Ladder 49”.

In Dear John, a young man in the military falls in love with a young woman while he’s on a two week break. They promise to stay together even when he goes back and they wrote to each other all the time. After the 9/11 attacks, his group was asked if they want to re-instate for another term and they all agreed they would. While he goes home for a week he has to break the news to his girlfriend who thought he was coming home for good. This winds up being a sex scene but it was the song that really got me. “The Moon” by the Swell Season is a very different genre of music and it’s very soul-piercing, if it had to be described.
Later on in the movie, John doesn’t receive any more letters from his girlfriend. The song that plays depicting those scenes builds up the moments to when he gets sent a break-up letter. “This is the Thing” by Fink was the song. It’s sad and the lyrics go right along with what was happening in the movie. It was a perfect moment for the song.

Now Ladder 49 is about a firefighter who falls through many floors from a floor collapse in a burning building. As he fades in and out of consciousness his memories also play in and out. SPOILER ALERT: The main character dies in the end because he wasn’t able to be saved by his fellow workers. While his casket was being carried out of the church and onto the fire truck, “Shine Your Light” by Robbie Robertson was playing. This song talks about a man who wants the Lord to shine his light down on him and life him up so he can see. I think that goes along incredibly well with the ending imagery.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Mild Winter, But Severe Spring?

With the mild winter that has almost passed us, there have been concerns that spring will also be unusual. We haven’t had this mild of a winter in a while so no one really knows what this upcoming spring will bring to the United States.
Last year in 2011, there were a record number of tornados during tornado season. 1,709 tornados were reported last year just falling short of the record of 1,817 in 2004. It even exceeded the average number of tornados in the past decade of 1,300. These tornados were cause by a very strong La Nina.
La Nina is a weather phenomenon. Basically, sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean drop below normal temperatures. This causes a very strong jet stream which is a main factor in severe weather.
While normally tornados hit the “Tornado Alley” of Mississippi and Alabama as well as Ohio and Tennessee valleys. Last year, however, most tornados hit below the Tornado Alley. Tornados frequently hit Texas and Kansas during last spring because warm and humid air from the Gulf of Mexico clashed with the dry air from the Rockies.
It is expected that the Gulf of Mexico will have warmed than normal temperature again this year. It’s very probable that this humid are will cause super cell tornados and severe storms. However, the La Nina seems to be weakening and will further weaken as we enter the 2012 spring. Since there will only be the dry humid air coming from the Gulf, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan are expected to be hit more than the states further south.
However, because of this mild winter, there hasn’t been much snowfall. Thanks to this, flooding won’t be as big of a problem as it was in 2011. It is very dry around the Great Lakes so spring flooding isn’t expected to be a problem. The Mississippi River is actually dry enough that it is expected to stay dry and have a 20 to 30 percent chance below average of reaching the flood stage this spring.
Not only is spring expected to bring many tornados, but it is also predicted that it will be the worst allergy season in 10 years. Because of the mild winter, people will allergies have had to take medicine earlier than usual. Pollen will be coming earlier producing higher pollen counts and more annoying allergies.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Oil Prices May Reach $5.00 Per Gallon

As the gas prices are always increasing, so are the public complaints. Many people have argued that it is too high and we need alternatives. Last November, gas prices were very low, close to only $3.00. Now we’re up to about $3.40 per gallon and expected to be at $5.00 by the end of the month. So what’s the deal?
Iran recently cut off oil supply to both the British and French suppliers, the same suppliers we get our oil from. Because we have less supply, the prices had to increase. Now Britain and France have to find alternative sources for crude oil.
Why did Iran do this? Just to tick the Americans off. In all seriousness, they are deciding to be immature because the European Union imposed sanctions on Iran’s crucial fuel exports. That includes a freeze of the country’s central bank assets and an oil embargo set to begin in July.
Although the price of a barrel of oil rose from $96 earlier this month up to almost $120, it’s not because of the decreased supply. Mostly it is because of concerns that the tensions between Iran and the United States and European nations will escalate. And yet, it is still possible that we will see oil prices increase over the next 12 to 24 months.
However, it could be possible that their plan isn’t going to have any effect on the United States. First of all, our United States’ refineries are very good at what they do. With the oil they put in, they get plenty more gasoline out of it. So much gasoline, in fact, that we actually export our excess gasoline from the United States to other countries. So a way we could have more available gas is to stop exporting our extra gasoline and keep it for the Americans.
Also, the British and French suppliers have slowly but surely been straying away from Iran’s oil supply. They have been needing less and less oil from Iran and therefore aren’t as dependent on Iran for oil as it may seem. They have been finding alternate sources already so the fact that the Iran oil supply was cut off, doesn’t create as much of a blow to anyone. In fact, this would actually be bad for Iran. Now they don’t have someone buying up their oil which is making them not take in as much revenue.
Whether the oil cut off was going to have a large effect or not on the United States was going to be determined by the DOW. The DOW was actually positive and didn’t take a hit at all from the cut off, showing that the United States people are still continuing to trust the market which is a very good sign.
Now although the oil dilemma may just have a chance of blowing over, it still doesn’t cover up the fact of how we are just so dependent upon gasoline. The reason we aren’t getting great alternatives for fuel in our vehicles is because no one wants to buy them! If we are still willing to pay the price of gas, no one is going to care to make alternatives. As soon as we can put our foot down and say that enough is enough, then we can start changing and become less dependable upon gasoline and oil.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Anything You Want

One of the cutest pictures I've seen:)

http://iwastesomuchtime.com/on/?i=25040

Visits iwastesomuchtime.com for more funny pictures and cute ones :)

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Whitney Houston's Legend Lives On

Recently, Whitney Houston passed away. The cause of her death is still unknown. But everyone knew what an impact she made on the music world and what an amazing voice she had.
Over her lifetime, she had 2 Emmy Awards, 6 Grammy Awards, 30 Billboard Music Awards, and 22 American Music Awards. She was discovered by Arista Records label head Clive Davis. Houston released seven studio albums and three movie soundtrack albums, all of which have diamond, multi-platinum, platinum or gold certification.
Whitney Houston is the only artist to chart seven consecutive No. 1 Billboard Hot 100 hits including "Saving All My Love for You"; "How Will I Know"; "Greatest Love of All"; "I Wanna Dance with Somebody (Who Loves Me)"; "Didn't We Almost Have It All"; "So Emotional" and "Where Do Broken Hearts Go".
Houston was a mezzo-soprano, and was commonly referred to as "The Voice" in reference to her incredible vocal talent. Her vocal range extended from G below middle C (G3) to high B-flat (B5. She was third in MTV's list of 22 Greatest Voices, and sixth on Online Magazine COVE's list of the 100 Best Pop Vocalists with a score of 48.5/50. In 2008, Rolling Stone listed Houston as the thirty-fourth of the 100 greatest singers of all time, stating, "Her voice is a mammoth, coruscating cry: Few vocalists could get away with opening a song with 45 unaccompanied seconds of singing, but Houston's powerhouse version of Dolly Parton's "I Will Always Love You" is a tour de force."
Whitney Houston's vocal styling has had a significant impact on the music industry. She has been called the "Queen of Pop" for her influence during the 1990s, becoming a rival to Mariah Carey and Celine Dion. Stephen Holden from The New York Times, in his review of Houston's Radio City Music Hall concert on July 20, 1993, praised her attitude as a singer highly, writing "Whitney Houston is one of the few contemporary pop stars of whom it might be said: the voice suffices. While almost every performer whose albums sell in the millions calls upon an entertainer's bag of tricks, from telling jokes to dancing to circus pyrotechnics, Ms. Houston would rather just stand there and sing."
Not only did Whitney influence people with her voice, but also with her ability to break down racial barriers. During the 1980s, MTV was becoming popular and received harsh criticism for not playing enough videos by black artists. With Michael Jackson breaking down the color barrier for black male artists, Houston did the same for black female artists. She became one of the few black female artists to receive heavy rotation on the network following the success of the "How Will I Know" video. Following Houston's breakthrough, other African-American female artists, such as Janet Jackson and Anita Baker, were successful in popular music. Baker stated that "Because of what Whitney and Sade did, there was an opening for me... For radio stations, black women singers aren't taboo anymore.”
It is obvious that Whitney had a substantial impact on the music world. Her voice was unlike anyone else’s and no one could quite match her talent. She was beautiful and sang to an almost perfection. Although I myself haven’t really listened to her as much as some other, from what I have heard, she’s unbelievably talented. Nowadays, we don’t see these kinds of voices, the kinds of voices that move you and hit all the right notes.
Whitney may have passed, but her legend will live on for being such an important part to great music.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Obama's New Plan

Birth control has been a huge social issue for a long time. Many people oppose it, while many people are for it. But recently it’s been getting a lot of attention due to President Barak Obama’s new birth control plan. He has called for religious groups to offer free contraceptive coverage for their workers.
Now this, to me, doesn’t seem entirely crazy. With the health insurance most jobs receive, free contraceptive is included in it. So why can’t people that work for religious groups have that too? If a Catholic woman works for a church, they don’t cover birth control in her health insurance plan but if a Catholic woman worked at a business corporation she does receive free contraception in her health insurance. They both believe in the same God and follow the same ideals, but just because one works for the church then she doesn’t get the birth control included in her health insurance plan? How is that fair?
Although I’m in favor of this plan, many, many Catholics are not. In the Catholic faith, birth control is not to be used. The faith does not believe in it and finds it to be a sin. In Catholicism, you are expected that you will only have sex after marriage so you wouldn’t need birth control. Wanting birth control then implies that you plan to have sex before marriage.
But sometimes, that isn’t even the case. Birth control actually helps for women’s menstrual cycles to be less of an issue. Some women have really bad cramps during their period and get extremely nauseous. By using birth control they can lessen their symptoms. Why should a woman be denied of that? She may still believe in sex after marriage but she just doesn’t want to deal with having such horrible menstrual cycles. I don’t see how that’s fair to deny her the right to have them be free under her health insurance plan.
Some Bishops around the nation had these things to say:
"We as Catholics will have no choice but to cover the cost for health insurance which provides such so-called 'services' that we consider immoral and cannot choose in good conscience."
Accusing the Obama administration of violating their first amendment rights, "We Catholics will be denied the right to follow our moral consciences, as well as the ability to offer health coverage for our employees."
"It forces us back into a position that we find untenable," said Patrick Cacchione, director of the Illinois Catholic Health Association. "We're not going to pay or provide or participate in something that we think is immoral."
Barak Obama, being under pressure, actually backed down on Friday to this new law he wanted to propose. He demanded that insurance companies step in and pay for the coverage instead.
I think this issue is going to continue to go back and forth but I really do like what Obama has in mind. I do understand that it goes against the beliefs of the Catholic Church, but I think all women should have that same coverage. Whether a woman is using it so she doesn’t become pregnant, or she’s using it to lessen her menstrual cycle symptoms, it’s the right thing to do to let them decide. If a woman is a true Catholic and gets this coverage, she wouldn’t need to use it, right? So what’s the worry? Besides, most Catholics I know (me being included) don’t follow every ideal the religion displays. So honestly, I don’t see it as a huge problem.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Annoying Retail Companies

Does anyone else find it super annoying that stores have to have people sign up for their personal credit cards?
Sears employees are required to ask every customer if they want to sign up for 1 of their 3 credit cards otherwise they get written up. But who would want that card?? It has a 25% interest rate! Nobody wants to sign up that! Why would the employees be judged on their performance based of the credit applications they have? Isn’t the customer always right? If they don’t want it, then they don’t want it.
Kohl’s also has their own credit card. The employees are required to ask about the customer signing up 3 different times during the single transaction. 3 times?! Really?! Are they going to suddenly change their mind once you ask them the third time as opposed to the first two?
I think it’s really annoying that retail companies do that. If you’re really going to revolve around customer service, the question needs only to be asked once and if the customer says no, then it shouldn’t be brought back up.